Monday, October 22, 2012

toulmin


Toulmin Analysis of Gay Marriage: A Rogerian Argument
Step One: Outlining the Argument
Claim: Gay marriage should be legalized
Reasons:
-because gay couples should get the same marriage rights
-because it’ll make America a more equal country
-because it’s can be a positive change
-because it would boost the economy
-because it encourages tolerance
Evidence:
“because gay couples should get the same marriage rights”- gay couples have to file taxes separately, they can’t make any decisions or see their loved one if he/she is in a critical medical condition
“because it’ll make America a more equal country”- people in America don’t have equal rights eg. Unequal paychecks because of gender
“because it’s a positive change”- women’s suffrage, freeing the slaves, they’re considered as positive changes even though people were reluctant at first
“because it would boost the economy”-   when people get marry they have to spend money, renting wedding halls, marriage license, etc
“because it encourages tolerance”- people are sometimes very intolerant towards things they don’t understand. Legalizing gay marriage would show that gay couples are equal to heterosexual ones and may change people’s opinion.
Warrants:
“because gay couples should get the same marriage rights”-
a.       People should be able to be a part of their loved one’s life
b.      It’s a basic civil right
“because it’ll make America a more equal country”
a.       America is a country based on equality
b.      Equality is a good
“because it’s a positive change”-
a.       civil rights is a worthy goal
“because it would boost the economy”-  
a.       We want a good economy
b.      A good economy will benefit America and its citizens
“because it encourages tolerance”-
a.       People should be tolerant
b.      Tolerance makes society better
Backing:
“People should be able to be a part of their loved one’s life”-being involved is important. If you have a say in your loved one’s life then it gives you more control and makes you feel more comfortable.
“It’s a basic civil right”-You should be able to marry the person you love.
“America is a country based on equality”- Our constitution is based off the Declaration which states that all men are created equal, ergo equality is important.
“Equality is a good”-Everybody has value therefor they should be treated with respect.
“civil rights is a worthy goal”- Civil rights are good, we enjoy having civil rights because without them our voices wouldn’t be heard.
“We want a good economy”- having a good economy means more jobs, which good for the people because they need jobs to make a living.
“A good economy will benefit America and its citizens”-Americans want jobs so they can support themselves.
“People should be tolerant”- being tolerant builds a better character and makes other people more comfortable. Being uncomfortable is bad because it prevents them from showing their full potential.
“Tolerance makes society better”- Tolerance encourages us to be open-minded and willing to accept different views. Having different perspectives makes a society unique and makes people more productive and willing to be involved.


Step 2:
The reason that gay couples should get same rights as heterosexual needs a better warrant. It’s more of an emotional argument than logical. The reason that it’s a positive change also needs more evidence and the warrant needs more backing up. The audience wont readily agree with that reason. Saying that it’ll boost the economy doesn’t need too much reasoning. Tolerance and equality being good is pretty self explanatory. The audience will most likely agree on that. Saying that people deserve civil rights doesn’t need as much convincing on how legalizing gay marriage will achieve that. 

1 comment:

  1. I think that this Toulmin analysis is excellent! You were worried about understanding what waarants are, but you did really well. You were very straightforward and brief with your reasons and warrants, which made your outline simple and understandable.
    I agree with your suggestions for revision, especially regarding the point that gay marriage will improve the economy. It seems that this point might not even be necessary in your arguement because you seem to focus more on the theme of civil rights. However, if you were still to include this point you should flesh it out more and provide examples to strengthen your related warrants, before you tackle the main reason. I can see that your intended audience is the people who oppose gay rights, but some of your warrants may not be be as obvious to this audience. WHile I naturally agree with you, other people may not.

    ReplyDelete