Karen Zheung
Ms. Parham
AP Language and Composition
The Truth behind JITCO
Japan is a
country very different from America in size, culture, and even business
strategies. For years they remained closed off to outsiders and prohibited any
entry until they were forced to trade. Even now Japan remains a very insular
nation. However, if Japan wishes to be able to compete in the market they must
adopt the western ideas of off shoring and outsourcing. In my pervious blog I
focused on how Japan outsourced their own workers to foreign countries. As for
off shoring Japan imports foreign workers rather than sending the jobs
overseas. In Japan’s effort to stay on the competitive edge they off shore in not
so obvious ways further deteriorating it’s relation with its surrounding
neighborhoods.
Since Japan
has a policy of giving college graduates life-time employment there’s a
shortage of unskilled workers to take on basic manufacturing jobs. As a result
of this shortage a Japanese training program called the Japan International
Technical Corporation Organization (JITCO) was created. JITCO attracts many Filipinos,
Vietnamese, and Chinese by supposedly supporting “the transfer of Japanese
technique and skills to developing countries through the schemes of training”
either through a training or internship program. (Satoshi). As alluring as this
sounds many of the trainees soon find out otherwise. In order for the workers to secure a spot as a
trainee many paid “fees and deposits to
local brokers, sometimes putting up their homes as collateral.”
(Tabuchi). Upon arriving in Japan the workers found themselves working long
hours under minimum wage. Zhang Yuwei, had paid $8,860 – several years income—to
a broker for the spot in the program. Ms. Zhang worked about eight hours a day
for about $3.77 an hour for the first year assembling cell phone keyboards sold
by Sharp. As her wages increased (still under min. wage) so did her hours. In addition
the “employer demanded her passport and housed her in a cramped
apartment with no heat, alongside five other trainees.” (Tabuchi). Working conditions were so bad that
“managers would tell Japanese employees to avoid her work area.”
(Tabuchi).
Although JITCO claims to be sharing its technical skills
while sharing cultural knowledge, those employed under the system strongly attest
to that. Rather than gaining any new knowledge the workers are only seen as a
source of cheap labor with their well-being completely over looked. Jiang Xiao Dong, aged 31 died after heart attack in June
2008 from being overworked. Japanese Labor Standards Office officially certified
his death as “karoshi” meaning death from overwork. The Office found that on
average Jiang worked “over 80 hours a week
for the 12 months preceding his death”. (Human Rights). Nor is the cultural
exchange taking place when managers verbally abuse the trainees with follow
orders or “swim back to the Philippines.”
(Tabuchi).
While this program
is definitely advantageous for the Japanese it undoubtedly creates more racial
tension especially between China and Japan. While it’s unclear what the future
holds for JITCO and the trainees it’s evident that Japan will use immoral
methods to get advance its economy as any other country would.
Works Cited
"2010 Human Rights Report: Japan." U.S. Department of State. U.S. Department of State,
08 Apr. 2011. Web. 07
Mar. 2013.
Hiroko
Tabuchi. "Japan Training Program Is Said to Exploit Workers." The New York
Times. The New York Times, 21 July 2010. Web. 07 Mar. 2013.
Ozawa, Harumi. "AFP: Japan's Trainee Programme 'human Trafficking':Lawyer." Google
News. Google, 22 July
2010. Web. 07 Mar. 2013.
Satoshi, Kamata. "Japan's Internship Training Program for Foreign
Workers: Education
or Exploitation? :: JapanFocus." Japan's Internship Training Program for Foreign Workers:
Education or Exploitation? :: JapanFocus. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Mar. 2013.
As always, I'm fascinated by how Japan's industrial system is so different from our own. But at the same time, in this post, the similarities are also striking. We both employ foreigners to do our labor, and frequently treat them terribly. The only difference is that the Japanese have no problem with bringing their foreign labor to their domestic factories, while if the United States tried anything like that there would be an immediate outcry about how the foreigners are coming to steal our jobs. I'm sure this difference is in large part due to Japan's guaranteed employment for college graduates, but it's still a very interesting difference to consider.
ReplyDeleteI really like that you went above and beyond and chose to discuss the relationship between two specific countries in regards to offshoring and outsourcing instead of focusing on just one. It is interesting to explore the implications of racial tension that arise when outsourcing is a factor. However, I would clean up the formatting of your writing. Things are in different fonts, sizes, colours, etc. It looks a little messy.
ReplyDelete